Saturday, 12 November 2011

Telling Tales: ways of thinking about narrative from Aristotle to Aarseth

(Alison Gazzard Lecture on 3rd November)

Starting this blog post with Aristotle’s quote
           
“We’ve considered that a tragedy is an imitation of an action that is complete in itself because it’s a whole of some quantity (because a whole doesn't’t have to have a quantity). Now a whole in something that has a beginning, a middle, and an end. A beginning isn’t necessarily after something else but it is followed by something. An end naturally follows something – either as necessary or as consequential – and has nothing following it. And a middle follows something and is followed by something else. Therefore a well-constructed plot cannot begin or end at any point the author would like”
      Book 7, Poetics
 


Nice words from Aristotle, one of the Greek legends! Now what he said, basically he said every story always have a beginning, a middle and an end.

Now some definitions!

narrative [na-ra-tiv], a telling of some true or fictitious event or connected sequence of events, recounted by a narrator to a narratee (although there may be more than one of each)… A narrative will consist of a set of events (the story) recounted in a process of narration (or discourse), in which the events are selected and arranged in a particular order (the plot). The category of narratives includes both the shortest accounts of events (e.g. the cat sat on the mat, or a brief news item) and the longest historical or biographical works, diaries, travelogues, etc., as well as novels, ballads, epics, short stories, and other fictional forms.

Chris Baldick, Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990, p. 145.

What a mighty long definition, Narrative in short definition is either a spoken or written account of connected events; a story of a bare narrative of the details. 

Narrative = story + plot
Story = what it is about?
Plot = how it is told?



Now one of the best parts!! I think this theory is really interesting and very seemingly correct as I’ve been reflecting on all those movies I have watched in my lifetime (those I can remember!)

The theory is called “Freytag’s triangle”

 
 

Gustav Freytag’s theory is a narrative structure that divided a story into five parts, which play the important parts in narrative story. These parts are: exposition (of the situation); rising action (through conflict); climax (or turning point); falling action and resolution.           

Now next one is about “Propp’s Character Types”, this made up of seven roles which, by the way, are always available in any narrative story out there.

The seven parts are

•The villain—struggles against the hero
•The donor—prepares the hero or gives the hero some magical object
•The (magical) helper—helps the hero in the quest
•The princess and her father—gives the task to the hero, identifies the false hero, marries the hero, often sought for during the narrative. Propp noted that functionally, the princess and the father can not be clearly distinguished
•The dispatcher—character who makes the lack known and sends the hero off.
•The hero or victim/seeker hero—reacts to the donor, weds the princess
•False hero—takes credit for the hero’s actions or tries to marry the princess.

I applied that theory to one of “The Simpsons” episodes in our lecture seminar, it was very challenging, because you cant tell which role but hard to apply to the characters in The Simpsons because some of the characters, i.e. Lisa Simpson, is she the Hero or False Hero, its hard because some of the characters does share two types or even three. It was fun! Mind-numbling it was.